Star Wars was a great movie for a kid. You knew,
you really knew who the bad guy was without a doubt because he was dressed in black from head to toe and wore a frickin' cape. Likewise, you knew who the good guy was because he's an uppity farm kid from the middle of nowhere and dressed in white. These are concepts a seven year old can understand. Why is it, as adults, we can't transcend absolute dichotomies?
The issues we face today are way more complex than that. I'm convinced that in politics, the winning strategy is to be able to define your position in seven words (or less). It doesn't have to be true, it just has to be easily-understandable. Because, that is all we have time for as a country. If your position requires any nuance or additional explanation whatsoever, you've lost.
The RIAA's recent update to
Music-Rules! Copyright curriculum encourages an absolutist viewpoint. The program teaches that one should never copy a creative work without permission from the copyright holder, but makes no mention of fair use. Obviously this omission is in the RIAA's interest, but on a more simple level, an absolute message is easier to understand. The little details confuse an already confusing issue. If your goal is propaganda, you need to be simple and direct. (Just say no!)
Copyright law in the US has changed a lot over the years, usually following the modernization of corporate interests. Copyright is out of sync with artists today who are armed with new tools and distribution methods. Legalese is dense and difficult to understand because it is trying to formally codify an inherently chaotic and unpredictable system. It is like grading a fugue. If you follow the rules properly, you'll get an A. If you don't, your music has a 'mistake' and points are subtracted. Copyright law has to be black and white and specific because it isn't possible to define the grey areas. Personally, I feel sampling a four-bar loop of a popular song, thus cashing in on the nostalgia of the original, merits some royalties. Something like John Oswald's plunderphonics, which uses hundreds of small snippets of audio from disparate sources, does not. Try codifying that in legalese.
There must an evolutionary advantage to explain our hard-wired love of dichotomies. These berries will kill you. These will not. Simple rules are a form of data compression and simple memes propagate with fewer errors. As a species, we like our absolutes, it makes life easier to understand.
Unfortunately, this also makes us vulnerable to exploitation.