Time to announce some things

Hi there. It has been a while. Here are a few things I made that might be interesting or useful to you.

Live 9 Mono Sequencer
Last Summer my primary focus was developing the mono sequencer device included with Live 9 Suite. Then later, I authored a series of videos describing mono sequencer's features. Here is the first video in the series.

Here is a playlist of all the videos in the series.

Live 9 Inspiration Tools
Along the way, I developed a suite of new devices for Live 9. Instruments, effects, etc, etc.. For lack of a better name, I'm calling it the stretta inspiration tools. Whatever. You can find it at my github account. In fact, I migrated all my current work to github where you'll be assured you'll have the latest version.

Live 9 CV Tools
If you're interested in the CV tools for controlling a modular with Live 9, that has been updated as well. This is known as stretta CV tools. One note is sigmund~ is required for calibration and it currently is 32-bit only. When sigmund~ gets updated, then calibration will work in 64-bit mode.

Beap
Beap is a software modular I developed as a pedagogical tool for Berklee College of Music. Beap emulates the the +/-5v signaling standard used in eurorack modulars. As such, it is completely signal compatible with a hardware modular. You can take any patch cord in Beap, send it out to your modular, and bring the signal from your modular back into Beap seamlessly. It even supports calibrated outputs for accurate 1v/oct tracking.

At Beap's github home, there is a wiki you might want to check out if you have questions.

I started developing Beap last November, but I've held off announcing it outside of Berklee until I had some base level of monome support added. I got to that point last week. Here is a recent video I made showing Beap in action.

Paper by Fifty Three iPad app review

Paper by FiftyThree (henceforth, 'Paper') is how you make and sell an application for the iPad. Paper is a sketchbook with endless pages. Actually, you can hop into multiple sketchbooks which look like Moleskines with customizable covers. Tap on a sketchbook to open and then flip pages like Flipbook.



What I like most about Paper is what it leaves out. It is the limitations and simplicity that make Paper really appealing and usable. There are only a handful of colors, but the palette is beautiful and useful, and, depending on the tools, mix or interact with each other. You can't zoom, but you can't zoom on a physical sketchbook either, and zooming would complicate the physics of how the tools respond.



The fountain pen produces believable strokes without running out of ink, streaking or jittery hand movements thanks to a smoothing algorithm. The strokes are elegant and confident.

One nod to digitalness is a well implemented undo feature which will step backwards through atomic sketching events which is very useful for experimentation or correcting accidental strokes that arise from attempting to invoke other gestures like turning pages or revealing the tool tray.

Paper is free, but it only comes with two tools: a very nice pen and an eraser. Paper makes use of in-app purchasing where you can buy up to four new tools to unlock. I found the watercolors and pencil most rewarding. The pen and marker seem to be of limited usefulness without a stylus. I can sketch with a pencil without fine motor fingertip control, but I feel a stylus is really necessary for the pen/marker tools for visibility reasons. You can't accurately place dots with your finger.

When you try to invoke a empty tool, Paper prompts you to buy it, but it also provides a sandbox in which you can try the tool before you buy it. You can buy each tool individually for $2, or the complete set for $8.

The first time I tried Paper, I knew my daughter would love it. It provides a satisfying set of sketching tools, without the expense or mess. It is so easy to sketch something out in pencil, add some ink strokes and dabs of color with the watercolor tool. Facebook, twitter and tumblr sharing are integrated, which would easily allow me to fill with cat sketch after cat sketch.



I never found computerized sketching all that rewarding. Photoshop and Illustrator are powerful design tools, but they're not lightweight and simple. Wacom tablets provide fine motor control, but the action is decoupled from the result. Wacom made some tablet-on-display devices that addressed this, but they were way too big and expensive, not to mention tethered. Paper is to the iPad what MacPaint was to the original Macintosh, not in form or function, but in spirit.

I would like to make an app similar in spirt to Paper, but for music. One obvious example would be music staff paper and a transcription engine. Being able to simply draw notes onto a staff without switching to a whole note tool, half note tool, etc. Things like note step direction and measure boundaries are taken care of simply because you draw them in.

Wishlist
I've read through some of the comments on Paper and there are some good feature requests and some feature requests that seem to break the spirit of how the application is designed, like zooming, for example. So, here are some things I would like to see:

• More tools like a charcoal tool
• More paper types like graph paper or types that change ink absorption rates or offer texture
• More document sharing options like email or iCloud
• Portrait orientation mode

I don't want a dedicated undo button since this would mean bringing the tray up and down. I like the undo gesture as it is.

iTunes Remote on an iPad

The iPad is worth it simply as a $500 remote control for the music system I already have in place. Sounds obvious, but I'll detail my stupidity here.

Most people will load up the iPad with media and play these files locally. This is really the intended use of the Video and Music apps. These apps also happen to have the ability to connect to a remote library. They also have the ability to stream audio to an AirPort or AppleTV. With lossless encoded files, this two way real time trip is a lot to ask of a wireless network and the result is dropouts.

But, there's the Remote app which provides a rich interface to control iTunes running on a remote computer. I acquired an aversion to this app from early experience. It was slow to connect and drained the battery of my iPhone quickly.



The Remote app will allow you to connect to an iTunes client which is, in turn, connected to a media server. I guess the reason I did this was due to the set of speakers physically connected to that particular client. Why not simplify matters further, connect directly to the iTunes server client and then use Airplay to send the audio wirelessly? Duh. Anyway, that was the stupidity part.

Oh, my inability to connect to my 1st generation AppleTVs from an iOS device seems to have vanished. So, I will explore the optical out on this device with renewed interest. I've seen 1st Generation AppleTVs go for $35 on ebay. Think of it as an AirPlay hot spot. Hang whatever boutique D/A you want off the back. Or not. It still has analog outs which should be good enough for most people.

So, I'm sitting there scrolling through my entire lossless music library on the iPad, and sending the audio to any combination of AirPlay devices in the house and it hits me: this is finally the music system I've always wanted. If it cost $500 for this one thing, it'd still be worth it. Granted, you already need some music sitting on an iTunes library, which I'm guessing you already have, and an Airport Express which you may also already have or an ebay Apple TV which are cheap. Heck, a dedicated iTunes remote may be a great purpose for a first generation iPad. ($300 refurbs!)

There have been other stabs at this in the past, like the Sonos system, but not with this kind of remote (although theirs was laudable), or at this price point.

Hold on to your excitement because this is a blog post about the iPad

Raised on a steady diet of 80's sci-fi, I found the technical symbols of the year 2000 kind of visually underwhelming. The most significant technical achievement of that time was the rapidly expanding internet, and that didn't look remotely like a hover board. So, while I'm blase on the outside about this magic window I can hold in my hand, rest assured, the 1984 version of me is soiling himself.

I call my parents every week. Actually, I FaceTime them on their iPad, mainly so my mom can gauge the accelerating retreat of my hairline. Last week the conversation opened with the new third generation iPad, aka, 'the iPad'. "Stupid name", my dad said. "Stupid, stupid, stupid." I politely disagreed and pointed out that the numbered naming scheme wasn't very extensible without rapidly becoming ridiculous (introducing, the iPad 14!) and just calling it an iPad is consistent with other Apple products like the MacBook and iMac.

Then my father went on to complain about the iPad's lack of USB port. "Why do you want a USB port?", I asked. He wants to plug in a keyboard and memory stick. He also wants to run Microsoft Office. I suggested a laptop. His response, "but I like my iPad!"

Apple products are defined as much by what isn't there as what is there. Apple is obsessed about Quality of Experience and pretty much every controversial design decision they've made can be tied to this impulse. They're not interested in compatibility with the status quo, they see a better way of doing things. Some consumers, my Dad included, feel like Apple is being belligerent.

Consider the USB port idea. On the surface, it makes sense. People could plug their USB sticks in and move files around. It isn't as simple as providing a USB port, though. You're talking about opening up the file system and all that entails. Yes that would give users more freedom, but that doesn't necessarily translate to a better experience.

The iPad is the ideal computer for for the things most people want from a personal computer: surfing the web, checking Facebook, email, watching video, and reading books.

I got my first iPad on Friday. I finally have some specific interests that would be served by the device and it was the right time to get in on the product's lifecycle. It seems that some consumers really don't have any idea why they want an iPad.

I'm heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem. This is the result of a conscious decision and years of curation. Before the iPod and iTunes, I spent a few minutes each morning determining what CDs I was going to bring to work with me. I started using SoundJam to encode music that would stay put on my work computer so I wouldn't have to go through the daily selection process. After iTunes came about, I quickly got used to having a large library of music to shuffle though and installed a dedicated iTunes machine in my home that served various clients on our local area network. I encoded all my CDs and stuffed the originals in a corner in my basement. As storage costs dropped, my media server expanded to include video, banishing DVDs to the basement as well. Apple TVs replaced DVD players. Deciding to encode for an Apple format, instead of something more open and generic seemed risky, but (right now) I'm glad I did. It wasn't a decision I undertook lightly due to the labor involved. (I had similar blind faith when I decided to go Apple Lossless for all my audio).

So, before this iPad arrived, I could already play any media in my library on any TV, computer or iPhone in the house. The iPhones and computers can also forward content to a target device via AirPlay. For example, I can use my iPhone to wirelessly stream music to my Genelecs, or multiple simultaneous sets of speakers around the house. I can't overstate how useful Airplay is. A friend of mine just sent me a dropbox link to an audio file. I was able to click on the link, send the audio to my monitors and then move back to mail. No drama, it just works. I'm not saying this feature is something exclusive to apple, but it's so easy to use and the interface is consistent across multiple targets (computer, iOS, AppleTV)

Speaking of which, I realized (cheap) first generation AppleTVs have a digital audio out. I haven't tried this, but you may be able to hang a nice D/A convertor off an AppleTV, and use it as a dedicated high quality AirPlay device. This would sound far better than an Airport Express. One strangeness I ran into was I can send audio from my Mac to any Airport Express or 1st gen AppleTV, but the iOS devices only see my Airport Express.

I was pleased that after entering my home sharing information, I had access to my entire media library on the network. The lack of video genre browsing or search is annoying and slows down the loading of thumbnails as it attempts to deal with hundreds of videos. I suppose I'm an edge case.

I already have devices that cover what I'd use the iPad for. My MacBook Pro covers most of it. I have an iPhone for mobility. I have a kindle for reading. I was very curious how the iPad would affect how I feel about the kindle. The iPad is sexier and more flexible, but for plain old reading, I still prefer the kindle. The iPad is uncomfortably heavy. I found myself wanting to prop the iPad against something because it is fatiguing to hold. I ordered one of those magic iPad covers that can be used to prop it up on something flat. This will help, but it isn't a solution. When I read a book, I hold the book and shift in various positions. One major reason why I prefer the kindle to a book is because it is less fatiguing to hold.

Size is another issue. I can stuff the kindle in a pocket. It weighs virtually nothing so I carry it with me everywhere and read more as a result. The iPad is a great internet appliance, but it isn't going to replace my kindle (yet). The kindle will travel with me and my iPhone. The iPad is going to stay at home.

I could see this as a valid market factor for a 7" iPad. The iPhone is too small (IMO) for book reading. I know people do it, but this isn't for me. A 7" iPad may be the proper size for this application. I envision a 7" form factor to be useful for scheduling and delivery applications. Look at those dedicated devices UPS drivers carry to track packages and collect signatures. A normal sized iPad is too big for this application, whereas a 7" device would be just right. Wouldn't it be useful to increase the granularity of delivery resolution and track the progress of a delivery route. "Out for delivery" could include an estimated arrival time. Imagine the ability to intercept a missed delivery at another point on the route. The UPS driver could take your signature and a photo of your ID.



This hadn't really occurred to me, but the iPad sports a 4:3 aspect ratio, while the iPhone is a 3:2 aspect ratio. Widescreen media fills the iPhone a bit more efficiently than the iPad. Despite the lovely resolution, a 16:9 movie isn't really satisfying on the iPad. (not that watching movies on the iPhone is my thing, either)

The power adapter
The power supply for the iPad is a bit larger than the iPhone power to USB adapter. Sorry if this isn't news to current iPad owners. This is the first time I've seen this. Anyway, at first I thought it was a beefier adapter but then I realized it is compatible with the wall plug Apple provides with their laptops. The idea is you leave the power cord at your desk. Take the power adapter itself and slap on the travel prongs. The design of the iPad USB power adapter allows general compatibility with this cable.



iPad supply (with included blade adapter detached) the others are an apple laptop cable, which can plug into the iPad adapter, a MacBook Pro power supply and an iPhone power supply for comparison

VNC
The first thing I did was set up VNC and a terminal. The terminal software I was using on my iPhone isn't iPad savvy so, it isn't worth mentioning. On the other hand, I was pleasantly surprised by Mocha VNC. I've been using Mocha VNC for many years now. I find it useful if I'm pinned under a cat and need to reach around the house. However, VNC on an iPhone screen is pretty cramped. Mocha VNC has improved a great deal since it was introduced and I was pleasantly surprised to find it works even better on the iPad.

Speaking of cats, I can say with authority that an iPad is the ideal device for anyone who often finds themselves with one arm trapped under a feline. If you're catless, you could say the iPad is a great 'couch' computer. Flipboard and Facebook are perfect examples of casual couch computing. The tumblr and G+ apps are iPhone apps that don't translate well to the iPad. You're better off using Safari, although I haven't learned the gesture (if it exists) to force links to a new tab. Favoring tumblr posts often results in tapping the wrong thing, but Safari is pretty forgiving about returning.

Game Graphics
I'm not much of a gamer, as I don't have much time to devote to the pastime, but I was curious enough about what the iPad could offer technically to drop $10 on Infinity Blade II and Real Racing 2 HD. They're both quite beautiful. The game play on Infinity Blade feels like an updated version of Dragon's Lair. Still impressive though. The iPad has the same problem as the Mac had for gaming. I'm a bit old-school I guess, but I want to mash buttons when I play a game. It is possible to design successful touch screen/accelerometer games which is why things like Angry Birds HD and Fruit Ninja HD are appealing, but arcade-type games suffer.

Photography
I bought iPhoto because it looked like something I'd find useful, and for personal stuff, I use iPhoto on my Mac. I also bought camera+ due to the rave reviews. I'm not sure why I have both. I was thinking it was a better alternative to the built in camera, offering more control, and it does have some features like stabilization and timer that could be useful, but much of the software is post processing features that is better done in iPhoto. I was expecting more in camera control, like exposure controls and Iso. Worse, it is a iPhone app that you have to run at 2x. Don't do what I did, just buy iPhoto.

Comics
I'd like to read some graphic novels again, and this is clearly an area where the iPad is a better device than the kindle. Stanza has PDF capabilities, but it seems to be EOL, so I'm using CloudReaders.

iOS Wish: Multiple accounts
The iPad isn't my first iOS device. I've owned a touch, an iPhone 3G, and an iPhone 4S. Those devices stayed in my pocket, they were 'mine' I don't feel the same way about the iPad, It is a general device that my entire family will use. Suddenly I want multiple accounts. I want my notes, to do lists, email, and work stuff to stay locked down.

iOS Wish: notification contexts
I would like to be able to tell (or schedule) notification contexts for my iOS devices A Sleep context would, for example, disable all notifications and send most phone calls to voicemail. I don't want my iPhone vibrating on my nightstand when someone on Facebook invites me to an event. A Work context would open certain notifications and mute others, and so on.

Continuity

Continuity by stretta

New modular track.

Practical Max 2

A tour of beat factory


beat factory can be downloaded here

Some information on how pattr can be used to morph sets of parameters.

moving

I get far better engagement on google plus, and much of my effort that would have been posted here is going in that direction. The only thing this blog allows me to do is interleave content and widgets with text. So, if I absolutely HAVE to tell something in that format, I'll do it here, but if you haven't done so already, I suggest you follow me at google+.

Here is an RSS feed of my google+
feed://plusfeed.appspot.com/101287835307087762724

morphing control voltage snapshots

mcvs is a 12 output cv source for use with DC coupled audio interfaces. You can define up to eight snapshots per output. Then, with a single MIDI controller (or using the on screen control) you can recall the snapshots or interpolate between them. I made this to give my Cwejman Res-4 the brains to perform a similar function as the Buchla 291e Triple Morphing Filter.

download the patch